In the last post I discussed the possibility that there are people that imperil others emotionally by the use of their biomagnetic field, which acts as a sort of WiFi of the body allowing them to connect to the nervous systems of another person. In such a case someone could conceivably affect the production of hormones to mimic the hormones present in the body of the person trying to affect such a thing in their subject. This of course would result from the influence of the person's biomagnetic field interfering with the electrical signalling of the subject's nervous system via Maxwell's Laws of Electromagnetism which of course states that a magnetic field passing through a conductive medium proportionally produces an electric current and an electric current passing through a conductive medium produces a magnetic field. Even in our bodies seeing as our bodies are conductors being composed of mostly water, one of nature's best conductors of electricity.
Of course as I have always stated that there are people that have used this fact for good (the cultures of the Far East and other parts of Asia have devised an entire system of medicine based upon this fact, using it for healing by means such as Yoga, Qi gong and Reiki) and there are people that use it for bad. I'm going to discuss a little bit about how it is and might be used for bad. Remember this is entirely reliant upon the state of the person's body who attempts such a thing, as the subject or recipient of such an effect will have their endocrine system produce hormones mimicking those in the body of the person attempting such a thing.
Build It And They Will Come
It is a practice in some societies to build up a person enigmatically via the support for them by others. This practice has long produced some of the great leaders, community leaders, celebrities, politicians and statesmen and even myths. This process involves slowly building support for such a construct by crossing the lines of the status quo very carefully with regard to such a person's stance in regard to social issues in order to garner the most support. More support often means more power. The problem for such a person is that when such a great responsibility falls upon the laps of such people and they comprehend that responsibility, they naturally seem to form an ethic that often contradicts that of some of the very people who support them. For those that have invested such an effort in building such a person, either locally in a community or globally as an icon, having control or sway over their bias is and has been an important issue for those who would build such a person so as to isolate or protect those whose interests confict the interests of those they are building. This is likely a natural side effect of such a person recognizing their responsibility to others as their responsibility grows. Some probably have an easier time separating the difference between the ethics of complicity and the price of standing against part of those who took part in such a construction.
For such a group attempting such a thing, the issue of management of this fact once they've built a person past a certain point is tantamount to them having sway of the things that are supported under their roof. For instance, someone built in a community with many activities, both legal and illegal might create a problem of ethics and responsibility for the person who has been propped up in such a way, if their experiences or observation has led them to believe that supporting certain illegal activities compromises the good of all and the health and happiness of those supporting such a person. Having sway over the decision and bias of such a person is probably important for those involved and finding balance in such a thing is problematic. Hard to believe that what I'm talking about here is a human being's freedom to act upon their responsibility to themselves and others and the right of others to curb it where it affects their freedom to choose what is right and wrong for them. This is not an attack upon what some might call Masonry, as likely those who've climbed to their heights regardless of the origins of that climb are likely all victims or at risk of what will be discussed here, much as many women are and have been from the 1960ies and onward.
Enter the biomagnetic field of the human body and the nervous system. Our body's own naturally built in WiFi that has likely been a part of every living creature with a nervous system and spinal column supporting the trunk of that system since the dawn of life. About four to six thousand years ago, a group of people living in the Far East whom had recently perfected farming in a somewhat hostile terrain had started to notice the effects of our body's natural energy field and began devising various systems of healing built around it. Another group of people thousands of years later of no particular geographical location or ethnicity start to understand similar properties of the body and utilize it for a very different set of goals. How to affect another person's conscious decision making process in their favour or bias to support their goals, habits and lifestyle. Enter the use the body's biomagnetic field for ifluencing cognitive process, perception and emotional state of another human. As I've said, many people (especially in the Far East and other parts of Asia and Africa) have largely used this for good and for medicinal purposes though in the years of recent (about the last three to five hundred years) there exists the possibility that many people have used this for at least emotional influence.
Cognition, Perception And Hormones
Most of our decision making process is at least influenced by our cognition which in turn influences our reaction. Cognition in this case represents our interpretation of the world around us through our senses or our interpretation of our memories thereof as influenced by our emotions. Many of our emotions have a foundation built upon our most basic needs and being unable to meet those most basic needs which in most cases are life sustaining such as the need to eat, drink and to have shelter from the elements. To prioritize the importance of those needs over our ability to veto them consciously, our body produces hormones that naturally implore us to do those things as they are required for our sustenance, meaning that our freedom to choose and do is affected directly by our endocrine system which is responsible for the production of many of those hormones. When our continued existence is threatened by someone else competing for the same sustenance, the body produces another set of hormones altogether that enable us to gain extra strength and mental acuity that might be needed to compete for the source of that sustenance.
The Beast In Us All
Also, when we are seeking to procreate and make copies of our genome to pass on and live on, the body and endocrine system also produces another set of hormones that signal us that the time is right to evaluate a suitable mate for such an undertaking. All of our cognition which interprets the world through our senses or our memories of the world are filtered through the effects of these hormones hence affecting our ability to make a decision with regard to our own conscious choice rather than our hormones. Some might even argue that such an interpretation might really be what is meant by the mark of the beast as referenced in many ancient religions. Meaning the ability of a person to make an effective decision in spite of these hormones rather than as a result of them. This is the foundation of what some might refer to as steering of the mind, or even mind control but better termed emotional manipulation.
An Example Of This Effect In Action
Biasing a person's decision making process by stimulating emotions either through social interaction or via this biomagnetic field and using it much like WiFi to connect to someone else's nervous system to induce the production of a set of hormones similar to the ones present in the body of someone attempting such a thing. If the person attempting so is mad or angry (has much cortisol or adrenaline present in their body) but is able to contain it enough to attempt to tune in or connect their biomagnetic field to the frequency or radio station of someone else's nervous system, they most probably could trigger the production of similar hormones in the body of the recipient. A little bit of verbal stimuli like aggression or instigation and the victim might blow up or react very aggressively if their cortisol and adrenaline levels are high enough. Possibly the source of many an anxiety attack?
That might give new evidence to the Robert Dziekański case in terms of the fact that he'd had an anxiety attack prior to his tazering. Maybe the RCMP were brought into a situation that they were actually set up to take the fall for. Perhaps Mr. Dziekański had been a victim of such an effect by people who practice such activity prior to this encounter. The RCMP with newly issued tazers and an unclear set of directives under which circumstances to use them would have walked into this situation not fully aware of the risk to his heart or details that would illustrate the fact that someone had been conducting this sort of activity to Dziekański. Without going deep into the territory of conspiracy, I believe this to be the case and that the RCMP were possibly set up to take the blame for such situation, possibly based upon jurisdictional rivalry between the RCMP and the various Policing unions at the time. That is not to say Unions or the Police are bad entities out to get others, but there is often rivalry that can occur as a result of the very different set of roles, objectives and tasking involved between such Policing forces where there is overlap in jurisdiction. What is more likely is the activity of a group outside of law enforcement that ramps up such people to the risk of such anxiety, outbursts via abusive use of the biomagnetic field and linking to another person's nervous system and leaves them in such a case to be handled by unsuspecting law enforcement officials of any Policing force, who are as much in the dark about the sources of this activity as the victims themselves. I propose that the composite theory that I've proposed here in this series of posts related to biomagnetism has credence in reality and may be currently employed by criminal elements or a gang operating in some cities in North America and possibly other parts of the world.
Negativity And Positivity As A System Of Reward And Punishment
What would be the motive for being able to affect someone in such a way so as to make them appear hateful, reactive or negative and how would that benefit those who do such a thing? In some societies it is common to give the social burden of the locality to the person who is deemed to be the least productive and the most negative. This in some places is overseen by an elaborate system of eavesdropping and an underground network just to ensure that the social burden ends up away from the source, as many times the source is criminal in nature and the closer such social burden is to the source, the more risk it is to such operations. Enter into this the use of information and communications technology (computers, tablets and cellular phones) and the potential both for the transfer of such social burden and even the theft of another person's work are seemingly limitless. Many gangs operate in areas and utilize colours as a means to subjugate an area based upon who controls the definitions for those colours. The goal for such gangs is to take the definitions away from the that are defined as part of social order that make things recognizable and easy to understand and locate in the context of a city and society (ie blue meaning business, education or work, orange meaning civic duty, red meaning financial restraint or arts and leisure and there are many other definitions that are not anti-establishment). Taking away these definitions and reverting them to those associated with such gangs and activity is one way that a group takes over an area. Such groups often employ illegal eavesdropping technology in order to do so and in order to gain control of an area. Colours often have significance in communications technology and the internet, so that is another set of communications channels that most gangs must also subvert for their purposes.
In doing so, much of the burden created from this activity and what it protects must be put somewhere and carried by someone by the end of the day, as part of a huge burden. This is determined by the level of productivity of a person and their level of positivity versus negativity. Enter into this the use of biomagnetism to affect or push someone to a negative stance or attitude and you have a very powerful tool for making other people into garbage bags for the containment of social burden. In such a practice and ideology, often those that conduct it in a large scale also utilize their information technology and eavesdropping capabilities to target a person from whom there is something good to steal, such as their identity or productivity because there is no effective or proven way to correlate the fact that one person's online account belongs to a physical person. One day bioinformatics might change this but for now there is no such way to prove such a link from person to online account and vice verse. Many of those who engage in the activity of illegal surveillance and eavesdropping are taking advantage of this fact to steal the credit from victims for what productivity they accomplish via computer technology in a given area and credit it to someone else, based upon the negativity/positivity principle as conducted by the (criminal) gang who employ its use.
When such a person has much of their productivity and effort stolen from them via such means and subsequently ends up a container for the local criminal activity and social burden (often becoming taunted and tormented by the very perpetrators thereof), there is the danger that such a person might explode from the pressure associated with it. For some getting such reactions has become a game for the gangs who do so to such a victim. In the 1960ies and before this was common place for how many women were treated as such and the use of this effect was often geared for them to become such containers of such burden as well. For some ideologies this idea is part and parcel of things and in modern society this has evolved into a very dangerous social activity and practice seeing as the boundaries of such a game and the personal freedoms that such a victim loses at the hands of the perpetrators is astounding. In some communities there are few people that take on such a thing as they would quickly fall victim to it, possibly losing their career, love life, family and friends and possibly even their home. All of this as a result of a group of people and gangs looking for a place to put the social burden that they've created and not having to take responsibility for their actions or answer for them.
Women Victims, Anxiety And Prozac
That gives a whole different perspective to many women who ended up living on prescriptions of Prozac in the 1960ies to calm tense nerves and the sudden onset anxiety. I see a possible relationship between that and modern occurrences of such anxiety attacks as well in both men and women. Likely the Pharmaceutical industry and many Doctors of the 1960ies sought a solution to a problem they had no means of understanding but needed a means to protect others from the dangers of errant production of such cognitive influencing hormones that seemed to occur erratically or out of cycle of context. Lets suffice it to say that it is not the members of the Far East attempting such a thing as they too utilize such a fact for healing and by way of honour and a similar oath as those sworn by Western Doctors, an oath to do no harm.
Power Steering And The Modern World
Now enter these modern means of power steering into the twenty first century and the means of dealing with one whose sense of responsibility and ethics stand against those whose activities aren't in the best interests of the health or well being of the community or the world depending upon the scale and scope. Some such people engaged in such a dire activity of trying to steer someone against their own sense of ethics might even make it into a game of measuring someone bias as such in order to determine whom had the most influence, hence claiming the credit and taking the harvest of whatever good (or bad) that came out of that purported influence of bias. The person being manipulated as such that might be termed a figurehead or puppet by some, does not seem to get ahead in the world like others do as most of their efforts are stolen before they can benefit from their own decision and action in such a process.
Maybe they end up living on two hundred and fifty dollars a month, hidden away from the world, single, alone and kept as such so that what they have to be taken might never fall into the hands of someone beyond the control of people who would do such a thing to someone so that others take the credit for it. A group of people might even conceive of keeping such a person in such a way so as to regularly harvest from them while returning little or nothing. Another group might use such a person to get them off the hook for their prior transgressions against others once again by harvesting from such an individual and once again returning nothing.
Stay Safe And Be Well
Brian Joseph Johns